MPEG LA a poplatky
Slyseli jste o tomhle?
http://www.osnews.com/story/23236/Why_Our_Civilization_s_Video_Art_and_Culture_is_Threatened_by_the_MPEG-LA
"You see, there is something very important, that the vast majority of both consumers and video professionals don't know: ALL modern video cameras and camcorders that shoot in h.264 or mpeg2, come with a license agreement that says that you can only use that camera to shoot video for "personal use and non-commercial" purposes (go on, read your manuals)."
http://www.osnews.com/story/23236/Why_Our_Civilization_s_Video_Art_and_Culture_is_Threatened_by_the_MPEG-LA
"You see, there is something very important, that the vast majority of both consumers and video professionals don't know: ALL modern video cameras and camcorders that shoot in h.264 or mpeg2, come with a license agreement that says that you can only use that camera to shoot video for "personal use and non-commercial" purposes (go on, read your manuals)."
Ano a taky tu valku v pozadi ohledne poplatku za streamovane video na netu, v tom clanku je to pekne sepsane. Muze nastat situace, kdy se bez toho nikdo uz neobejde a pak tomu daji skrt. Jak u tech kamer , tak u internetu,... ,bylo jim zrejme jasno, ze tu bude free source, tak tomu daji utrum, uz kdyz stisknes "record" na kamere, takova pojistka treba do budoucna ..., tocis, zaplat. Podle me to ale do takovych rozmeru neskoci, kamery budou zkratka tocit do neceho jineho, redcode napr, ha,ha, a hotovo ...
